Rich Morris' Comics - YAFGC and The ComixBlog

Discussion forum for fans of YAFGC and Rich's ComixBlog. Because all the cool webcomics have one.

Jump to YAFGC / Jump to The ComixBlog

It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:54 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:44 pm 
Creator
Creator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 1:48 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Halifax
Because someone asked for it. Clothing and fashions of history. Discuss.

_________________
"Goblins are evil too, Dad."
"No, son. Goblins are just... sorta bad."
-Bob & Ben


Top
 Profile WWW YIM  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:54 am 
Beholder
Beholder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 352
Too generic, IMO. Clothing has varied a lot through ages and places, what exactly do you want to know?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:08 am 
Costello
Costello
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:54 pm
Posts: 1038
Location: Puget Sound Area, Washington
Okay... I'll bite. Am I the only one who's intrigued by the way that armor had moved through fashions? Things like plate harness being made to look like puffed and slashed civilian clothing to sabbatons being pointy because pointy shoes were all the rage.

While we commonly think of armor as being the ultimate in utilitarian clothing, in practice, since it commonly worn by the aristocracy, it was often an expression of haute couture.

_________________
RZ-007lc. Side of Republic.


Top
 Profile WWW  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:25 am 
Beholder
Beholder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 352
Hmmm... I rather tend to think of armor as essentially utilitarian, though, of course, there might be exceptions, specially ceremonial ones.

What I do recall is the anecdotal case of some West African king (can't recall who) who was gifted a full plate armor and spent all day dressed in such fashion under the tropical sun until he died... cooked in it.

Anyhow, on topic, the elite had their armors made up for the individual, so guess they could ask for whatever fancy they liked.

But otherwise it seems to me that the main goal of armor was pragmatical: to protect the person wearing it.

Personally I am more intrigued if anything for the changes in male clothes such as the vanishing of the "skirt" of shirts or pullovers (is that the culotte that the sans-culottes did not wear?), the development of pants (I believe a Celtic or Germanic fashion, also of practical use, specially for horsemen), or why did the horn-like headdress of Medieval Basque women vanish. Also, who invented the beret, how the early 19th century neck clothing evolved into the modern tie, why was fashionable then to wear wigs, why the Roman fashion of combing the hair forward disappeared, and about those horrible pointy shoes too...

What about early Modern "sliced" short pants? And the Renaissance custom of young women showing one breast?

Lots of stuff. Few answers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:58 pm 
Enforcer
Enforcer
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:09 am
Posts: 4664
Location: Greece
Having recently published an article on the 'dictatorship of fashion' i was fascinated by this bit: at some point during medieval times a Muslim Spaniard invented the concept of changing fashions, and while the West loved the concept and began changing what they wore with increasing frequency, the Japanese and Chinese considered this a folly and were proud of the fact that their dress never changed -until the 19th century.
Just one of the very interesting facts that came up when i was assigned what i thought to be a somehow boring article.

_________________
Chaos is the Law of Nature, and Order just a Dream of Men


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:21 pm 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1231
Location: Halifax
Quote:
And the Renaissance custom of young women showing one breast?


Cite, please. I have a feeling you're thinking of the aristocratic trend of allegorical paintings, where it was fashionable to paint young ladies in a pose as a breastfeeding Madonna. As far as I know, this was not ever a street fashion, especially considering that female costume in the 'renaissance' almost invariably included some form of corsetry.

_________________
"[T]he difference between Good and Evil is that Good pretends not to enjoy this sort of thing."
- Arachne in prison


Top
 Profile WWW  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:57 am 
Beholder
Beholder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 352
Example: Lucrezia Borgia by Bartolomeo Veneto.

Image

For what I have read (in history forums, don't ask me for further sources), in that time (she lived in 1480-1519) it was fashionable (at least in Italy) for young women to show one of their breasts as sign of health and youth.

I imagine it was not a street fashion, of course. But a public indoor fashion seems to have been.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:11 am 
Beholder
Beholder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 352
Morgana wrote:
Having recently published an article on the 'dictatorship of fashion' i was fascinated by this bit: at some point during medieval times a Muslim Spaniard invented the concept of changing fashions...


That's something interesting I did not know. I bet it happened during the first Taifa period (1031-1085) that is something like the Andalusi Renaissance, when all the minor realms, detached from the once powerful Caliphate, competed with each other in science and arts. It was an illustrated and tolerant period but they were weak in the military aspect, so they were forced to accept the intervention of the Almohads, who were like the Taliban of their time.

Quote:
Just one of the very interesting facts that came up when i was assigned what i thought to be a somehow boring article.


Seems that was rather not boring, right.

You are the expert then. :biggrin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:24 am 
Beholder
Beholder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 352
Anyhow, regarding old medieval fashions the one I find more curious is the headdress used by Basque women in the Middle Ages, which was something like this:

Image

Not the best reconstruction I have ever seen but the one I could find...

It somehow vanished later on, replaced by a more simple covering.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:54 am 
Enforcer
Enforcer
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:09 am
Posts: 4664
Location: Greece
The most intresting thing about clothes is the social changes they reflect. Ribbon decorated codpieces that exalted manhood as femininity was suppressed, the Spanish and French sumptuary laws that reflected the fears of the noble class that the middle classes were showing themselves to be more powerful than them and had to be stopped, the fact that the otherwise God-fearing, Inquisition programmed Spanish women revolted only when told they could not wear their clothes the way they liked them and got their way... and of course today's insanity that is too close to home to find fascinating -just a bit revolting.

_________________
Chaos is the Law of Nature, and Order just a Dream of Men


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:08 am 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1231
Location: Halifax
Maju - that's exactly the kind of painting I'm talking about. It's an allegorical fantasy painting, of the kind usually done of courtesans. You're looking at a 16th century porn shoot.

From the museum in which the painting is housed:

"Traditionally regarded as a portrait of Lucrezia Borgia, the scandal-ridden daughter of Pope Alexander VI, this painting actually shows an unknown woman who had herself depicted as Flora, the ancient goddess of spring. This circumstance explains the flowers in her right hand and also accounts for her fantastic costume, which – with turban, wig, and one breast exposed – would not have been appropriate for the portrait of an honourable (married) woman. Educated courtesans, on the other hand, very popular figures especially in sixteenth-century Venice, often had themselves depicted in the erotic role of Flora. "

This is what Venetian women were actually wearing at that time:

Image

Also see this engraving, from 1584 (Hendrik Goltzius):

Image

_________________
"[T]he difference between Good and Evil is that Good pretends not to enjoy this sort of thing."
- Arachne in prison


Top
 Profile WWW  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:59 am 
Enforcer
Enforcer
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:09 am
Posts: 4664
Location: Greece
Unless you were in ancient Crete, women did not go around bare breasted... but some of the cleavages are far more sensual than nudity would be.

_________________
Chaos is the Law of Nature, and Order just a Dream of Men


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:01 pm 
Dragon
Dragon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:39 pm
Posts: 679
Location: Minnesota, USA
Hey, Hilary - do you have any expertise in Far Eastern historical costuming (Chinese, especially)? I've had some interest in learning more about it, just based on some of the movies I've watched over the years...

_________________
Now blogging at Confessions of a Neowhovian
http://www.neowhovian.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:22 am 
Beholder
Beholder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Posts: 352
Morgana wrote:
Unless you were in ancient Crete, women did not go around bare breasted...


I've read somehwere read that Celtic women did. :?

Quote:
... but some of the cleavages are far more sensual than nudity would be.


Never, IMO. I like thinks plain and simple: no makeup, no high heels and the less clothing the better. My tastes anyhow... :biggrin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historic Clothing.
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 8:20 am 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1231
Location: Halifax
You have to be extraordinarily careful about the 'read somewhere's and 'but the re-enactors said...'s. There's very little contemporary evidence about anything real to do with 'the celts' (and by which I assume you mean the standard fallacy about the indigenous peoples of Ireland/Scotland?) The romans made up a huge number of stories about them based on rumour, and then the Victorians did the same thing for different political reasons more than a thousand years later. Most of what's taken for granted that we 'know' about the celts was invented wholesale in the 19th century ('clan tartans' and so on).

Apologies if formatting is funky - our net at home is down and the blackberry is not ideal for posting.

As far as far eastern costume goes, alas, I know very little. My eastward knowledge stops dead somewhere arod Constantinople.

_________________
"[T]he difference between Good and Evil is that Good pretends not to enjoy this sort of thing."
- Arachne in prison


Top
 Profile WWW  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Chronicles phpBB2 theme by Jakob Persson. Stone textures by Patty Herford.
With special thanks to RuneVillage